TVs and monitors · Asus
A 32-inch 4K WOLED that owners buy for its black levels and motion clarity, then judge almost entirely by its matte coating, a trade-off several made and then reversed.
The coating question is the one thing owners settle clearly: those who compared this matte panel against a glossy OLED came down firmly on glossy, and they say the difference was visible immediately, not something they had to hunt for. Even owners who sent it back grant that its black levels are in a different class from the IPS and VA screens they came from.
Owners are divided on how much the panel improves on what they already had. Coming from a good IPS or a BenQ 4K, several found the jump underwhelming: blacks better, colours and brightness not, and brightness sometimes worse. One owner who upgraded from a 27-inch IPS returned it disappointed given the price.
Pick up to three. You get a page with just those, side by side, on the subjects owners raised.
The part that keeps people is the OLED behaviour itself: black levels nobody disputes, and motion clarity without the ghosting they put up with for years on IPS panels in fast games. One owner running a PS5 sees games land between 90 and 120 fps and has not noticed flicker outside loading screens.
What owners had to adjust to is the matte finish. Several describe it as noticeably grainy next to a glossy OLED or even a good matte IPS, and a number of them did not adjust at all: they returned it, in some cases after also returning the glossy QD-OLED sibling, and ended up on the glossy WOLED version instead. That is the recurring pattern in these accounts, more than any settings tweak or workaround.
Nothing in these accounts points to hardware failing. The complaints are about how the panel looks and feels to use: grainy coating, text colour fringing that one former owner found obvious, and flicker that gave another headaches and nausea almost at once. Against that, one owner has not perceived flicker in normal play. The fix owners actually applied was returning the monitor and buying a different one.
Long-term accounts are thin. Most of the people here owned the PG32UCDP briefly, often inside a return window, before moving on. There is no account of months or years of use, so how the panel holds up over time, including burn-in, is simply not something these owners can tell us yet.
Nothing has a clear majority against it yet. Counted from the owners who raised each subject, not from everyone. A subject is judged once at least 4 owners raise it.
21 more subjects came up from fewer than 4 owners each, which is not enough for a fair reading. To see how it stacks up, compare it with another machine.
The same owner, asked again at each point. Fills in as owners answer.
Two questions: how long you have had it, and anything you would like to say about it. Then we ask again as it ages. This helps our mission.
More in tvs and monitors: LG OLED, LG 65, LG 32.
Among the 5 owner accounts here that gave a duration, 0 described a failure.
Before you buy one used, ask the seller: how old it is, whether it was ever repaired and by whom, and whether any of the parts above have been replaced. Ask to see it run. A receipt tells you the warranty start date; most makers honour the term only for the first owner.
Public discussions we read and summarised in our own words. Nothing here was submitted to Still Kicks.
Counted from public accounts by people who said they own it, and summarised by Still Kicks in its own words. Not a manufacturer claim, a lab test or an estimate.
No account needed to look. Sign in with Google only if you want to track something you own.