Drones beta · DJI
The Mini 4 Pro is a compact drone that owners keep flying for its portability, though the accounts collected so far center heavily on collision and airspace restriction incidents rather than everyday use.
Obstacle avoidance is something owners are divided on. Some accounts describe the system working as intended: the drone detected an obstacle, halted, climbed, and rerouted. Others describe collisions with branches that the sensors did not catch in time, resulting in damage.
Every account that mentioned geofencing described it negatively, including reports of the drone force-landing mid-flight and flight range being restricted when the app could not authenticate a login. However, only three accounts raised this, which is too few to draw a firm conclusion.
Pick up to three. You get a page with just those, side by side, on the subjects owners raised.
The accounts collected so far do not give a clear picture of routine ownership. What does come through is that flying near obstacles, trees in particular, stays a genuine risk even with avoidance sensors active. Two owners described branch strikes that ended in repairs or full replacements, and at least one described the drone ending up in water after being forced into a tight corridor by airspace restrictions.
Beyond those incidents, the data is thin. Eighteen accounts were labelled, but the themes that surfaced are almost entirely incident reports. What everyday flying looks like after the first few months, what owners still enjoy about it, and what becomes routine are not well represented in the current data set.
Collision damage is the clearest reliability signal in the data. One owner paid $400 for a full replacement after a branch strike. Another sent a drone in for repair after it went into a river. A third paid around $75 to restore a different DJI drone after a similar incident, though that account covered an Avata 2 rather than the Mini 4 Pro specifically.
Long-term accounts are thin. The collected data skews toward early incidents and does not include owners reporting back after a year or more of regular flying. Whether the electronics, motors, or camera hold up over time is not something this data can answer yet.
Nothing with a clear majority yet. Owners who raised these subjects were split, or too few to judge.
Counted from the owners who raised each subject, not from everyone. A subject is judged once at least 4 owners raise it.
4 more subjects came up from fewer than 4 owners each, which is not enough for a fair reading. To see how it stacks up, compare it with another machine.
The same owner, asked again at each point. Fills in as owners answer.
More in drones: DJI FPV, DJI Mini 4, DJI Avata 2.
Public discussions we read and summarised in our own words. Nothing here was submitted to Still Kicks.
Counted from public accounts by people who said they own it, and summarised by Still Kicks in its own words. Not a manufacturer claim, a lab test or an estimate.
Nothing here asks for anything about you unless you write to us.