Owners keep the Voron 2.4 for clean, dependable prints, ASA included, and for fast printing, and some accept an occasional toolhead repair as the price.
Read from 21 owner accountsUpdated October 2, 2026Thin evidence: 21 owner accounts so far, fewer than the 40 we want before we trust a pattern.Owner rating: none yetAdd yoursCompare it
What keeps coming up
Print quality is the one theme with a clear lean: all three owners who raised it were positive, citing nice ASA prints, dazzling results, and prints that are very clean. That is too few accounts for the site to give it a verdict.
Owners are divided on print speed, and too few have raised it to judge. One says the printer prints slowly, though cleanly, while another reports 350+ mm/s at 10k acceleration.
The routine described by one owner is simple: switch it on, let it heat for about half an hour, then print. That owner calls the results dazzling and the upkeep low. Another says they get nicer ASA prints at double the speed of their other printer, using a Dragon UHF hotend.
Speed is where accounts differ. One owner who built the printer's parts on an Ender 3 now runs the Voron at 350+ mm/s with 10k acceleration and finds it hard to believe. Another says it prints very well but slowly, and finds their Ender 3 cleaner. Only a few owners have written about daily use, so this is a thin picture.
Reliability & repairs
One owner built a 2.4 r2 years ago, fitted a new door about a year ago, and describes it as low maintenance and highly reliable. Another owner with a 2.4 was three days into a toolhead rebuild because their older EBB36 v1.2 board stopped reading thermistors correctly. The same owner said their other printer has run over 2000 hours with only basic maintenance and no trouble.
The long-term accounts are thin. Two owners speak to how it holds up, and they disagree: one has had no trouble, the other lost days to a toolhead electronics fault. That is not enough to say how often the board failure happens or whether the fix is routine. The one repair described was a rebuild of the toolhead.
More detail What owners praise, where they are split, and the
follow-up timeline
What owners praise
print quality4 of 4who raised it
Nothing has a clear majority against it yet. Counted from the owners who raised each subject, not from everyone. A subject is judged once at least 4 owners raise it.
8 more subjects came up from fewer than 4 owners each, which is not enough for a fair reading. To see how it stacks up, compare it with another machine.
Does it still kick?
The same owner, asked again at each point. Fills in as owners answer.
Own this one?
Two questions: how long you have had it, and anything you would
like to say about it. Then we ask again as it ages. This helps our
mission.
Still good used? What a used buyer should know, from owners a year or more in
Among the 0 owner accounts here that gave a duration, 0 described a failure.
Before you buy one used, ask the seller: how old it is, whether it was ever repaired and by whom, and whether any of the parts above have been replaced. Ask to see it run. A receipt tells you the warranty start date; most makers honour the term only for the first owner.
Where this came from
Where this came from
Public discussions we read and summarised in our own
words. Nothing here was submitted to Still Kicks.
Forum threads21 accounts
Owner accounts collected here0
Counted from public accounts by people who said they own it, and summarised by Still Kicks in its own words. Not a manufacturer claim, a lab test or an estimate.
No account needed to look. Sign in with Google only if you want to track something you own.