Drones beta · DJI
Owners who have had a first-generation Mavic Pro for years now talk about it mostly as an older drone: few logged hours, strict geofencing, and a range that newer DJI models have left behind.
No owner in this sample offered clear praise, so there is no strong recurring point for it. The nearest thing is that its geofencing worked exactly as designed: one owner recalls it refusing to take off in a restricted area the moment the controller connected, before satellites had even locked.
Geofencing is the theme that comes up most, and both owners who raised it found it restrictive: one describes a fly safe zone capping flight at 60 metres above takeoff when local law allows 120, which blocked a tower inspection. Two accounts is too few to call it a settled complaint.
Pick up to three. You get a page with just those, side by side, on the subjects owners raised.
Once the novelty passes, the pattern in these accounts is that the drone gets flown less. One owner has only about seven hours logged on a first-generation unit. Another says theirs is collecting dust and is thinking about selling it. Neither gives a reason beyond that, so this is a picture of how the drone sits in a cupboard rather than a verdict on how it flies.
What owners had to adjust to was DJI's software fences. One could not launch at all inside a restricted area. Another, inspecting towers, was held to a height ceiling well below the legal limit because the system did not account for local terrain. A third owner, comparing it to current models, dismisses the range extension a beacon accessory offers as small next to the claimed range of a Mavic 3 Classic or a Mini 3 Pro, and adds that the Mini has a better camera at a quarter of the weight.
There is only one account that touches on failure, and it is about setup rather than hardware. That owner crashed a Mavic Pro Platinum on day one because the return to home settings for low battery had not been configured properly, and notes that obstacle avoidance on this generation was rudimentary. Nothing in the sample describes a part wearing out, a battery fading, or a repair.
The long-term accounts are thin. Twelve owners were labelled, no theme was raised by more than two of them, and none rated the drone positively. That is not enough to say how a Mavic Pro holds up over years of use, only that the owners who spoke about it here had mostly moved on to newer drones or stopped flying it much.
Nothing with a clear majority yet. Owners who raised these subjects were split, or too few to judge.
Nothing has a clear majority against it yet. Counted from the owners who raised each subject, not from everyone. A subject is judged once at least 4 owners raise it.
The same owner, asked again at each point. Fills in as owners answer.
More in drones: DJI FPV, DJI Mini 4, DJI Avata 2.
Public discussions we read and summarised in our own words. Nothing here was submitted to Still Kicks.
Counted from public accounts by people who said they own it, and summarised by Still Kicks in its own words. Not a manufacturer claim, a lab test or an estimate.
Nothing here asks for anything about you unless you write to us.