Robot vacuums · Narwal
Owners with heavy-shedding dogs keep it for overnight runs that leave floors mopped and pet hair cleared without tangled brushes, putting up with an app that takes work to set up.
The mopping is the part owners single out most, with tile floors coming up spotless and results improving further when the vacuum and mop cycles are run separately so debris is cleared first.
The app is the clearest recurring complaint: owners say it needs refinement and that anyone who is not comfortable with technology may struggle to make the robot behave the way they want.
Pick up to three. You get a page with just those, side by side, on the subjects owners raised.
What keeps delighting people is the morning after. Households with dogs that shed constantly run it overnight, wake up to clean floors, and find the main brush free of fur and long human hair. The only hair that turns up is a few strands on the side brushes. The dust bin compresses debris so bag changes are infrequent, and the routine shrinks to emptying the bag and keeping the water tanks topped up. Several owners say they would buy it again and are already eyeing the newer Narwal models as an upgrade rather than switching brands.
The adjustments are around water and the app. One owner who returned it found the mop used enough water that the dirty tank needed emptying and the clean tank refilling several times per session, which mattered in a house where muddy dogs forced mopping every other day. The app draws more complaints than praise, though a minority find it more customisable than rivals. Obstacle avoidance divides people: some say it stops bumping baseboards and mapped a home in minutes, others say it did poorly in testing, and one notes there is no way to turn the avoidance off. Suction is not in question, and one owner points to a hidden Vortex mode stronger than the top listed setting.
Every account that spoke to reliability was negative, and the pattern is a robot that works well for around a year and then develops faults. Reported failures include a broken caster wheel, a rattling sound in vacuum mode, a unit that stopped returning to its base after a job, and a board and lidar sensor failing just after the warranty ended, with a repair quote the owner considered a large share of the purchase price. Support experiences are divided: some owners got help, others found regional support disconnected and unable to sort parts or accessories.
The long-term accounts are thin. Only a handful of owners described faults, most positive accounts come from the first week to first few months, and the site cannot yet say how typical the post-warranty failures are. What the accounts do show is that when it breaks, owners are left negotiating repair costs rather than fixing it themselves.
Parts named in the 4 accounts that describe a failure
Nothing with a clear majority yet. Owners who raised these subjects were split, or too few to judge.
Nothing has a clear majority against it yet. Counted from the owners who raised each subject, not from everyone. A subject is judged once at least 4 owners raise it.
The same owner, asked again at each point. Fills in as owners answer.
More in robot vacuums: Neato D7, Neato D8, Ecovacs X1.
Public discussions we read and summarised in our own words. Nothing here was submitted to Still Kicks.
Counted from public accounts by people who said they own it, and summarised by Still Kicks in its own words. Not a manufacturer claim, a lab test or an estimate.
Nothing here asks for anything about you unless you write to us.