Owners keep the QN90A as a bright LED set they trust to last, with one owner preferring it over the OLED sitting beside it, though the accounts here are few.
Read from 8 owner accountsUpdated September 24, 2026Early read: 8 owner accounts so far. We usually wait for 12 before we say much.Thin evidence: 8 owner accounts so far, fewer than the 40 we want before we trust a pattern.Compare it
What keeps coming up
One owner who has both says he prefers his QN90A to his LG B4 OLED, and after comparing Sony's top LED and OLED sets he could not settle on which looked better. Another with a long run of Samsung LED sets says none has broken and the oldest is still his main TV after six years.
The negative accounts filed under burn in are not about this set failing. One owner argues that emissive panels still burn in and that brightness-limiting algorithms only mask it, which is the case he makes for choosing an LED like this one. Too few accounts to judge.
The recurring thread is comparison. Owners who also have an OLED keep going back to the QN90A and find the picture holds its own, sometimes winning depending on the scene. What they get is a set they do not have to think about: no worrying about static logos or leaving a game paused.
The other thing that shaped ownership was price. One owner got a 55 inch model marked down heavily because it was a year or two old and the store wanted it gone, and treats that as a big part of why the set feels like a good buy. Nothing in these accounts describes day-to-day annoyances with the software or the brightness behaviour on the set itself.
Reliability & repairs
The one long-horizon account comes from an owner of three Samsung LED sets over 25 years, none of which failed, with a six-year-old Q90T still in daily use. He bought the extended warranty every time but never needed it. The burn-in discussion is about emissive panels, not this one, and is offered as a reason the LED route is safer.
That is the extent of it. Eight accounts, none of them a multi-year report on the QN90A specifically, and no reports of a fault, a repair, or a return. We cannot say how it holds up yet, only that no one here has said it broke.
More detail What owners praise, where they are split, and the
follow-up timeline
What owners praise
Nothing with a clear majority yet. Owners who raised these subjects were split, or too few to judge.
Nothing has a clear majority against it yet. Counted from the owners who raised each subject, not from everyone. A subject is judged once at least 4 owners raise it.
Does it still kick?
The same owner, asked again at each point. Fills in as owners answer.
Counted from public accounts by people who said they own it, and summarised by Still Kicks in its own words. Not a manufacturer claim, a lab test or an estimate.
Nothing here asks for anything about you unless you write to us.