3D printers · Prusa
A CoreXY printer owners keep for its polished slicer profiles and top-tier prints, often bought as the path to INDX, at a price many of them find hard to justify.
Print quality is the clearest praise: owners describe it as a top-tier machine, and several single out the PrusaSlicer profiles as having a polish they have not seen on other printers. One newcomer was surprised that results this good were possible on a first printer.
Pricing is the clear complaint. Owners who stand behind the machine still object to what it costs relative to how far behind Prusa is on multi-material, and to paying premium money for something that feels unfinished, with some comparing it unfavourably to Bambu on that basis.
Pick up to three. You get a page with just those, side by side, on the subjects owners raised.
Once it is set up, the thing that keeps delighting people is the output. Owners who came from an XL or a Core One say the prints and the tuned profiles are the reason they stay, and one who ordered on day one reports six months of happy printing and says Prusa deserves the support. The enclosed CoreXY layout also matters: a couple of owners chose it specifically because the XL was too big or too awkward to enclose, and the extra volume over the Core One is what they wanted.
What people had to adjust to is mostly around the ecosystem rather than the printing. Owners are divided on upgrade eligibility: some are pleased that an upgrade path exists, others are confused about whether the non-plus L gets the plus upgrade bundled with the INDX conversion, why the L kit is cheaper than the L+ kit, and whether a MK4S owner can ever move up. Several bought the L as a bet on INDX and are waiting on belts, chamber heating and timelines to see whether the bet pays off. One Core One owner said the L made their earlier machine feel dead-ended, though they remain happy with it.
The printing itself is what keeps working. Owners with multiple Prusa machines say the Core One L and its siblings print well and consistently once they are running. The problems that come up are around getting there: one owner who went all in on the Core One, MMU3, Core One L and INDX said nothing went smoothly, from shipping onward, and that the whole rollout felt like a beta test even though the printers work great eventually. Another had the machine back at Prusa for service, including a belt swap, and missed having the upgrade fitted at the same time. Owners who hit these issues went to support, with mixed results: some got useful help, others came away more uncertain than before.
Long-term accounts are thin. The longest ownership reported here is about six months, most owners are still in the ordering, back-order or upgrade-planning stage, and several comments are about a machine that has not arrived yet. There is not enough here to say how it holds up over years, only that early output is good and the early ownership experience has been bumpy for some.
Nothing with a clear majority yet. Owners who raised these subjects were split, or too few to judge.
Nothing has a clear majority against it yet. Counted from the owners who raised each subject, not from everyone. A subject is judged once at least 4 owners raise it.
The same owner, asked again at each point. Fills in as owners answer.
More in 3d printers: Anycubic Kobra 3, Creality Ender 3, Creality Hi.
Counted from public accounts by people who said they own it, and summarised by Still Kicks in its own words. Not a manufacturer claim, a lab test or an estimate.
Nothing here asks for anything about you unless you write to us.